Gunderson Graham – MPI

### Gunderson, Graham Alan / MPI: (page created at November 2007 update)

## USP 2006/0163971 A1, Jul. 27, 2006, SOLID STATE ELECTRIC GENERATOR, Graham Alan GUNDERSON, USA

# Inventor: Graham Alan Gunderson, Spokane, WA (US)

Correspondance Address: The Law Office of Lawrence Edelman, 130 San Aleso Avenue, San Fransisco, CA 94127 (US).

# Assignee: Magnetic Power Inc.

# Abstract: A solid-state electrical generator including at least one permanent magnet, magnetically coupled to a ferromagnetic core provided with at least one hole penetrating its volume; the hole(s) and magnet(s) being placed such that the hole(s) penetrating the ferromagnetic core’s volume intercept flux from the permanent magnet(s) coupled into the ferromagnetic core. A first wire coil is wound around the ferromagnetic core for the purpose of moving the coupled permanent magnet flux within the ferromagnetic core. A second wire is routed through the hole(s) penetrating the volume of the ferromagnetic core, for the purpose of intercepting this moving magnetic flux, thereby inducing an output electromotive force. A changing voltage applied to the first wire coil causes coupled permanent magnet flux to move within the core relative to the hole(s) penetrating the core volume, thus inducing electromotive force along wire(s) passing through the hole(s) in the ferromagnetic core. The mechanical action of an electrical generator is thereby synthesized without use of moving parts.

This application claims priority to Provisional Application 60/645,674 filed Jan. 21, 2005, entilteed PERMANENT MAGNET DRIVEN ELECTRIC GENERATOR.

# Background of the invention:
1. Field of the invention: This invention relates to a method and device for generating electrical power using solid state means.

2. Description of the related art: It has long been known that moving a magnetic field across a wire will generatae an electromotive force (EMF), or voltage, along the wire. When this wire is connected in an electrical closed circuit, in order to perform work, an electric current is driven through this closed circuit by the induced electromotive force.

It has also long been known that this resulting electric current causes the closed circuit to become encircled with a secondary, induced magnetic field, whose polarity opposes the primary magnetic field that first induced the EMF. This magnetic opposition creates mutual repulsion as moving magnet moves toward such a closed circuit and attraction as that moving magnet then moves away from the closed circuit. Both these actions tend to slow, or ‘drag’ the progress of the moving magnet generating the EMF, causing the electric generator to act as a magnetic brake, in direct proportion to the amount of electric current produced.

Gas engines, hydroelectric dams and steam-fed turbines have historically been used to overcome this magnetic braking action occuring within mechanical electric generators. A large amount of mechanical power is ultimately required to produce a large amount of electrical power, since the magnetic braking interaction resulting from induced electrical current is generally proportional to the amount of power being generated.

There has been a long felt need for a generator which reduces or eliminates this well-known magnetic braking interaction, while nevertheless generating useful electric power. The need for convenient, economical, and powerful sources of renewable energy remains urgent . When the magnetic fields within a generator are caused to move and interact by means other than applied mechanical force, electric power can be supplied without the necessity of consuming limited naatural resources, thus with far greater economy.

# Summary of the invention: It has long been known that the source of the magnetism within a permanent magnet is a spinning electric current within ferromagnetic atoms of certain elements, persisting indefinitely in accord with well-defined quantum rules. This atomic current encircles each atoms, thereby causing each atom to emit a magnetic field, as a miniature electromagnet.

This atomic current does not exist in magnets alone. It also exists in ordinary metallic iron, and in any element or metallic alloy that can be ‘magnetized’, that is, exhibits ferromagnetism. All ferromagnetic atoms and ‘magnetic metals’ contain such quantum atomic electromagnets.

In specific ferromagnetic materials, the orientation axis of each atomic electromagnet is flexible. The orientation of magnetic flux within, as well as external to the material, easily pivots. Such materials are referred to as magnetically ‘soft’, due to this magnetic flexibility.

Permanent magnet materials are magnetically ‘hard’. The orientation axis of each atomic electromagnet is fixed in place within a rigid crystal structure. The total magnetic field produced by these atoms cannot easily move. This constraint permanently aligns the field of ordinary magnets, hence the name ‘permanent’.

The axis of circular current flow in one ferromagnetic atom can direct the axis of magnetism within another ferromagnetic atom, through a process known as spin exchange. This gives a soft magnetic material, like raw iron, the useful ability to aim, focus, and redirect the magnetic field emitted from a magnetically hard permanent magnet.

In the present invention, a permanent magnet’s rigid field is sent into a magnetically flexible, ‘soft’ magnetic material. The permanent magnet’s apparent location, observed from points within the magnetically soft material, will effectively move, vibrate, and appear to shift position when the magnetization of the soft magnetic material is modulated by ancillary means (much like the sun, viewed while underwater, appears to move when the water is agitated). By this mechanism, the motion required for generation of electricity can be synthesized within a soft ferromagnetic material, without requiring physical movement or an applied mechanical force.

The present invention aynthesizes virtual motion of magnets and their magnetic fields, producing an electrical generator described herein, which does not require mechanical action or moving parts. The present invention describes an electrical generator wherein magnetic braking phenomena, known as eexpressions of Lenz’s Law, do not oppose the means by which the magnetic field energy is caused to move.

The synthesized magnetic motion thereby manifest without mechanical or electrical resistance. This synthesized magnetic motion , instead of physical ‘magnetic braking’ common to mechanically-actuated electrical generators. Because of this novel magnetic interaction, the solid-state static generator of the present invention is a robust generator, requiring only a small electric force to operate.

# Brief description of the drawings: So that the above-recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to various embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.

FIG.1 is an exploded view of the generator of this invention.
FIG.2 is a cross sectional elevation of the generator of this invention.

FIG.3 is a schematic diagram of the magnetic action occuring within the generator of FIGs. 1 and 2.

FIG.4 is a circuit diagram, illustrating one method of electrically operating the generator of this invention.

# Detailed description of the invention:
FIG.1 depicts a partially exploded view of an embodiment of an electric generator of this invention. The parts have been numered, with the numbering convention applied to FIGs. 1, 2 and 3.

Numeral 1 represents a permanent magnet with its North pole pointing inward toward the soft ferromagnetic core of the device. Similarly, numeral 2 indicates permanent magnets of preferably the same shape and composition, with their South poles aimed inward toward the opposite side, or opposite surface of the device, The letters ‘S’ and ‘N’ denote these respective magnetic poles in the drawing. Other magnetic polarities and configurations may be used with success; the pattern shown merely illustrative of one efficient mode of adding magnets to the core.

The magnets may be formed of any polarized magnetic material. In order of descending effectiveness, the most desirable permanent-magnet materials are Neodymium-Iron-Boron (NIB) magnets, Samarium Cobalt magnets, AlNiCo alloy magnets, or ‘ceramic’ strontium-barium or lead-ferrite magnets. A primary factor determining permanent magnet material composition is the magnetic flux stength of the particular material type. In an embodiment of the invention, these magnets may also be substitued with one or more electromagnets producing the required magnetic flux. In another embodiment of the invention, a superimposed DC current bias can be applied to the output wire to generate the required magnetic flux, in substitution of, or in conjunction with said permanent magnets.

Numeral 3 indicates the magnetic core. This core is a critical member of the generator, determining the characteristics of output power capacity, optimal magnet type, electrical impedance, and operating frequency range. This core may be any shape, composed of any ferromagnetic substance, formed by any process (sintering, casting, adhesive bonding, tape winding, etc.). A wide spectrum of geometries, materials, and processes are known in the art of magnetic cores. Effective common materials include, but are not limited to, amorphous metal alloys (such as that sold under the trademark designation ‘Metglas’ by Metglas Inc., Conway S.C.), nanocrystalline alloys, manganese and zinc ferrites as well as ferrites of any suitable element including any combination of magnetically ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ ferrites, powdered metals and ferromagnetic alloys, laminations of cobalt and/or iron, and silicon-iron ‘electrical steel’. This invention successfully utilizes any ferromagnetic material, while functioning as claimed. In an embodiment of the invention, the composition may be bonded iron powder, commonly available from many manufacturers.

Regardless of core type, the core is prepared with holes, through which wires may pass, which have been drilled or formed to penetrate the core’s ferromagnetic volume. The toroidal core 3 shown includes radial holes pointing toward a common center. If, for example stif wire rods were to be inserted through each of these holes, these wires would meet at the center point of the core, producing an appearance similar to a spoke wheel. If a square or rectangular core (not illustrated) is used instead, these holes are preferably oriented parallel to the core’s flat sides, causing stiff rods passed through the holes to form a square grid pattern, as the rods cross each other in the interior ‘window’ area framed by the core. While in other embodiments of the invention, these holes may take any possible orientation or patterns of orientation within the scope of the present generator, a simple row of radial holes is illustrated herein as one example.

Numeral 4 depicts a wire or bundle of wires, i.e. ouput wire 4, that pick-up and carry the generator’s ouput power. Typically this wire is composed of insulated copper, though other output mediums such as aluminum, iron, dielectric material, polymers, and semiconducting materials may be substitued. It may be seen in FIG.1 and FIG.2 that wire 4, which serves as an output medium, passes alternately through neighboring holes formed in core 3. The path taken by wire 4 undulates, passing in an opposite direction through each adjacent hole. If an even number of holes is used, the wire will emerge on the same side of the core it first entered on, once all holes are filled. The resulting pair of trailing leads may be twisted together or similarly terminated, forming the output terminals of the generator shown at Numeral 5. Output wire 4 may also make multiple passes through each hole in the core. Though the winding pattern is not necessarly undulatory; this basic form is shown by way of example. Many effective connection styles exist; this illustration shows the simplest. All successful connection methods pass wire 4 at some point through the holes in the core.

Numeral 6 in FIGs. 1, 2 and 3 points to a partial illustration of the input winding, or inductive coil used to shift the permanent magnets’ fields within the core. Typically, this wire coil encircles the core, wrapping around it. For the toroidal core presented, input coil 6 resembles the outer windings of a typical toroidal inductor, a common electrical component. For the sake of clarity, only a few turns of coil 6 are shown in each of drawings FIGS. 1, 2 and 3. In practice, this coil may cover the entire core, or specific sections of the core, including or not including the magnets, while remaining within scope of the present invention.

FIG.2 shows the same representative generator of FIG.1, looking transparently ‘down’ through it from above, so the relative positions of the core holes (dotted lines), the path of the output wire, and magnet positions (as shaded areas) are made clear.

The generator shown uses a core with 8 radially drilled holes. The spacing between these illustrative holes is equal. As shown, each hole is displaced 45 degrees from the next. All holes’ centers lay along a common plane; this imaginary plane is centered half-way along the cores’ vertical thickness. Cores of any shape and size may include as few as two, or as many as hundreds of holes, and a similar number of magnets. Other variations exist, such as generators with multiple rows of holes, zigzag and diagonal patterns, or output wire 4 molded directly into the core material. In any case, the basic magnetic interaction shown in FIG.3 occurs for each hole in the core, as detailed below.

FIG.3 shows the same design, viewed broadside. The curvature of the core has been flattened to the page for the purpose of illustration. The magnets are represented schematically, protruding from core top and bottom, with arrows indicating the direction of magnetic flux – arrow heads pointing north, tails south.

In practice, the free, unattached polar ends of the generator’s magnets may be left as-is, in open air, or provided with a common ferromagnetic path linking unused North and South poles together, as a magnetic ‘ground’. This common return path is typically made of steel, iron or similar material, taking the form of a ferrous enclosure housing the device. It may serve the additional purpose of a protecting chassis. The magnetic return may also be another ferromagnetic core in repetition of the present invention, forming a stack or layered series of generators, sharing common magnets between generator cores. Any such additions are without direct bearing on the functional principle of the generator itself, and have therefore been omitted from these illustrations.

Two example flux diagrams are given in FIG.3. Each example is shown in a space between schematically depicted partial input coils 6. A positive or negative polarity marker indicates the direction of input current, applied through the input coil. This applied current produces ‘modulating’ magnetic flux, which is used to synthesize motion of the permanent magnets, and is shown as a double-tailed horizontal arrow (a) along the core 3. Each example shows this double-tailed arrow (a) pointing to the right or the left depending on the polarity of applied current.

In either case, vertical flux entering the core (b, 3) from the external permanent magnets (1, 2) is swept along, within the core, by the direction of the double-tailed arrow representing the input coil’s magnetic flux (a). These curved arrow (b) in the space between the magnets and holes can be seen to shift or bend (a -> b), as if they were streams or jets of air subject to a changing wind (a).

The resulting sweeping motion of the permanent magnets’ fields causes their flux (b) to brush back and forth over the holes and wire 4 passing through these holes. Just as in a mechanical generator, when magnetic flux brushes or ‘cuts’ sideways across a conductor in this way, EMF or voltage is induced. By connecting an electrical load across the ends of this wire conductor (Numeral 5, in FIGs.1, 2) a current is allowed to flow through the load in a closed circuit, delivering electrical power able to perform work. Input of an alternating current across the input coil 6 generates an alternating magnetic field (a) causing the fields of permanent magnets 1, and 2 to shift (b) within the core 3, inducing electrical power through a load (attached to terminals 5), as if the fixed magnets (1,2) themselves were physically moving. However, no mechanical motion is present.

In a mechanical generator, induced current powering an electrical load returns back through output wire 4 creating a secondary induced magnetic field, exerting forces which substantially oppose the original magnetic field inducing the original EMF. Since load currents induce their own, secondary magnetic fields opposing the original act of induction in this way, the source of the original induction requires additional energy to restore itself and continue generating electricity. In mechanical generators, the energy-inducing motion of the generator’s magnetic fields is being physically actuated, requiring a strong prime mover (such as a steam turbine) to restore the EMF-generating magnetic fields’ motion, against the braking effect of the output-induced magnetic fields (the induced field (c), and the inducing field (b)), destructively in mutual opposition. It is this inductive opposition which ultimately must be overcome by physical force, which is commonly produced by consumption of other energy resources.

The electric generator of the present invention is not actuated by mechanical force. The generator of the present invention also makes use of the induced, secondary magnetic field in such a way as to not cause opposition, but instead addition, and resulting acceleration of magnetic field motion. Because the present invention is not mechanically actuated, and because the magnetic fields do not act to destroy one another in mutual opposition, the present invention does not require consumption of natural resources in order to generate electricity.

The present generator’s induced magnetic field, resulting from electric current flowing through the load and returning through output wire 4, is that of a closed loop encircling each hole in the ocre admitting the output conductor or conductive medium (4,c). The present generator’s induced magnetic fields create magnetic magnetic flux in the form of closed loops within the ferromagnetic core. The magnetic field ‘encircles’ each hole in the core carrying output wire 4, similar to the threads of s screw ‘encircling’ the shaft of the screw.

Within this generator, the magnetic field from output medium or wire 4 immediately encircles each hole formed in the core (c) carrying this medium or wire 4. Since wire 4 may take an opposing direction through each neighboring hole, the direction of the resulting magnetic field will likewise be opposite. The directions of arrows (b) and (c) are, at each hole, opposing, headed in opposite directions, since (b) is the inducing flux and (c) is the induced flux, each opposing one another while generating electricity.

However, this magnetic opposition is effectively directed against the permanent magnets that are injecting their flux into the core, but not the source of the alternating magnetic input field 6. In the present solid state generator, induced output flux (4,c) is directed to oppose the permanent magnets (1,2) not the input flux source (6,a) that is synthesizing the virtual motion of those magnets (1,2) by its magnetizing action on core 3.

The present generator employs magnets as the source of motive pressure driving the generator, since they are the entity being opposed or ‘pushed against’ by the opposing reaction induced by output current which is powering a load. Experiments show that high-quality permanent magnets can be magnetically ‘pushed against’ in this way for very long periods of time, before becoming demagnetized or ‘spent’.

FIG.3 illustrates inducing representative flux arrows (b) directed oppositely against induced representative flux (c). In materials typically used to form core 3, fields flowing in mutually opposite directions tend to cancel each other, just as positive and negative numbers of equal magnitude sum to zero.

On the remaining side of each hole, opposite the permanent magnet, no mutual opposition takes place. Induced flux (c) caused by the generator load currents remains present; however, inducing flux from the permanent magnets (b) is not present since no magnet is present, on this side, to source the necessary flux. This leaves the induced flux (c) encircling the hole, as well as input flux (a) from the input coils 6, continuing its path along the cone, on either side of each hole.

On the side of each core hole where a magnet is present, action (b) and reaction (c) magnetic flux substantially cancel and annihilate, being oppositely directed within the core. On the other side of each hole, where no magnet is present, input flux (a) and reaction flux (c) share a common direction. Magnetic flux thereby adds together in these zones, where induced magnetic flux (c) aids the input flux (a). This is the reverse of typical generator action, where induced flux (c) is typically opposing the ‘input’ flux originating the induction.

Since the magnetic interaction herein is a combination of magnetic flux opposition and magnetic flux acceleration, there is no longer an overall magnetic braking, or total opposition effect. The braking and opposition is counterbalanced by a simultaneous magnetic acceleration within the core. Since mechanical motion is absent, the equivalent electrical effect ranges from idling, or absence of opposition, to a stengthening and overall acceleration of the electrical input signal (within coil 6). Proper selection of the permanent magnet (1,2) material and flux density, core 3 material magnetic characteristics, core hole pattern and spacing, and output medium connection technique create embodiments wherein the present generator will display an absence of electrical loading at the input and/or an overall amplification of the input signal. This ultimately causes less input energy to be required in order to work the generator. Therefore, as increasing amounts of energy are withdrawn from the generator as output power performing useful work, decreasing amounts of energy are generally required to operate it. This process endures, working against the permanent magnets (1,2) until they are demagnetized.

In an embodiment of this invention, FIG.4 illustrates a typical operating circuit employing the generator of this invention. A square-wave input signal, furnished by appropriate transistorized switching means, is applied at the input terminals (S), to the primary (a) of a step-down transformer 11. The secondary winding (b) of the input transformer may be a single turn, in series with a capacitor 12 and the generator 13 input coil (c), forming a series resonant circuit. The frequency of the applied square wave (S) must either match, or be an integral subharmonic of the resonant frequency of this 3-element transformer-capacitor-inductor input circuit.

Generator 13 output winding (d) is connected to resistive load L through switch 14. When switch 14 is closed, generated power is dissipated at L, which is any resistive load, for example, an incandescent lamp or resistive heater.

Once input resonance is achieved, and the square wave input frequency applied at S is such that the combined reactive impedance of total inductance (b+c) is equal in magnitude to the opposing reactive impedance of capacitance 12, the electrical phases of current through, and voltage across, generator 13 input coil (c) will flow 90 degrees apart in resonant quadrature. Power drawn from the square wave input-energy source applying power to S will now be at a minimum.

In this condition, the resonant energy present at the generator input may be measured by connecting a voltage probe across the test points (v), situated across the generator input coil, together with a current probe around point (i), situated in series with the generator input coil (c). The instantaneous vector product of these two measurements indicates the energy circulating at the generator’s input, ultimately shifting the permanent magnets’ fields in order to create useful induction. This situation persists until the magnet are no longer magnetized.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that a square (or other) wave may be applied directly to the generator input terminals (c) without use of other components. While this remain effective, advantageous re-generating effects may not be realized to their fullest extent with such direct excitation. Use of a resonant circuit, particularely with inclusion of a capacitor 12 as suggested, facilitates recirculation of energy within the input circuit, generally producing efficient excitation and a reduction of required input power as loads are applied.

While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.

1. A device for generating electricity, the device including
One or more permanent magnets;
A ferromagnetic core, intercepting flux emitted from said permanent magnet(s), and wound with one or more wire coils acting to magnetically modulate said core;
One or more core holes penetrating the volume of said core;
One or more output wires passing through said core holes, whereby said core holes intercept magnetic flux from said magnets bearing on said core.

2. The device of claim 1 wherein the wire coils wound around said ferromagnetic core modulate exposure and interaction between flux from said magnets and said core holes carrying said output wires.

3. The device of claim 2 whereby said modulation of exposure generates electromotive force along said output wires routed through core holes in said core.

4. The device of claim 3 further containing a resonant circuit comprised of a capacitor in association with said wire coil(s) wound around said ferromagnetic core for purpose of magnetically modulating said core.

5. The device of claim 3 further containing a resonant circuit comprised of a capacitor in association with said output wires passing through said core-holes for delivering output power.

6. The device of claim 5 incorporating impedance-matching transformers, inductors, and inductor-capacitor networks in said resonant circuit.

7. THe device of claim 2 wherein means of magnetically modulating said core is achieved by exposure to an externally generated magnetic field, such as the Earth’s magnetic field, or other independent source of externally generated magnetic flux, in substitution of, or in conjunction with said wire coil wound around said core.

8. The device of claim 3 wherein one or more of said permanent magnets are substituted with one or more electromagnets to generate the required magnetic flux.

9. The device of claim 2 wherein said output wire carries a superimposed DC current bias generating the required magnetic flux, in substitution of, or in conjunction with said permanent magnets.

10. The device of claim 2 further containing a circuit comprised of one or more electrical reactances in association with said wire coil(s) wound around said ferromagnetic core for magnetically modulating said core, wherein said electrical reactance comprises a capacitor, an inductor, a transformer and combiantions thereof.
End of patent.

## MPI Claims OverUnity Prototypes Exist

Responding to recent criticism about hype, CEO, Mark Goldes elaborates on Magnetic Power Inc.’s recent achievements. Anticipates 1 kW generators available by the end of 2008.
by Mark Goldes for Pure Energy Systems News

Without exception, all of our work is based on prototypes. The report by Lee Felsenstein, a well known and respected Electrical Engineer in Silicon Valley, has been posted on our website for months. (Ref .) It is based on his second visit to our lab, where he had an opportunity to inspect an early GENIE (Generating Electricity by Nondestructive Interference of Energy) prototype.

There have been a number of GENIE prototypes constructed, as well as rotary prototypes that have repeatedly been Over Unity. Individuals who have a reason to do so and have signed Non Disclosure Agreements have visited the labs and had the opportunity to reach their own conclusions about our work.

Five multi-billion dollar firms have signed NDAs and are interested in GENIE for uses ranging from handheld electronics to multi-megawatt generators. Lab work indicates GENIE will be able to replace batteries of any size, thus making it practical for future cars to be electric and capable of selling power to local utilities, when parked. That last potential is addressed in an article that appeared both here and on our website. It appears possible that many future cars will pay for themselves, once such systems are optimized by utilities. And utilities are paying close attention to GENIE at this time.

Construction of fuel burning power plants of every variety is likely to have a difficult time competing with the modest cost of Genie generators, once they are in mass production.

Technical progress reports will be made public when it makes sense to do so. The debacle in London a few months ago by the firm based in Dublin was a lesson in how not to proceed.

One-kilowatt GENIE generators are moving toward the market. And while some may find it hard to believe, they are likely to be in production by the end of next year.

# Reference: – Oct. 19, 2007 press release by MPI.

## Time for a “Triple Play”, October 18, 2007, by vlad

Time for a “Triple Play”: Reduce Oil Prices and Dependence on Fossil Fuels, while Meeting the Growing Demand for Electric Power

1. The Cost of Oil: Oil prices are climbing towards $100/barrel. In two years there will be one billion automotive vehicles worldwide. If current trends continue, by 2030 world oil supply, projected to be 70 Million barrels per day, will fall far short of the estimated daily demand. The projected shortfall of 50 Million barrels of oil per day will drive fuel costs far beyond tenable levels. The world will see more wars, such as the one we are waging in Iraq, unless a path is opened that can dramatically reduce demand.

2. Fossil Fuels and Global Warming: James Hansen at NASA Goddard speaks for many scientists, stating that we must dramatically reduce the use of fossil fuels in less than a decade to avoid life threatening catastrophe. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, that shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore, concluded that drastic shifts are happening much more rapidly than earlier predicted. It seems that by 2050, one billion Asians will lack enough water and up to six hundred million people will suffer climate induced hunger. As the average global temperature increases, each 1 degree Celsius rise deprives between 400 million and 1.7 billion people of sufficient water.

Greenland now loses more ice each year than all the ice in the Alps. “…the process is running faster than the models,” said Konrad Steffen, at the University of Colorado at Boulder, a Greenland expert who serves as a U.S. government advisor on abrupt climate change. “It is scary,” said Steffen. Not only in Greenland, but in Antarctica and elsewhere there is massive melting of ice. More than 180 nations have coastal areas at risk. Two-thirds of them have over 5 million people under threat of serious flooding. Included are cities such as New York, London, Miami, Shanghai and Tokyo.

3. The World’s Huge Appetite for Energy: Energy consumption is at the core of human existence. It virtually controls what we eat, how we live, where we go, how we are entertained, our health, knowledge, defense and exploration. The world’s demand for energy is surging.

The International Energy Outlook 2006, by the U.S. Department of Energy, forecasts electricity use will grow by an average of 2 percent per year worldwide and almost twice as rapidly in the developing world. Robust economic growth in many developing nations is expected to boost demand for electricity for air conditioning, cooking, space and water heating, and refrigeration. Global energy consumption is projected to increase by 71% from 2003 to 2030. We need to accelerate development of cost-effective, sustainable, alternatives.

The Triple Play: A revolutionary new technology, GENIE™ (Generating Electricity by Nondestructive Interference of Energy) is being developed at Magnetic Power, Inc. (MPI).

MPI has dedicated more than 20 years of research and development into exploring breakthrough technologies. To reverse the trends discussed above MPI envisions a technological revolution, developed commercially, that has limited impact on available planetary resources. GENIE is projected to be easy to manufacture and use, as well as inexpensive, thus capable of rapidly achieving global impact.

Based upon proprietary breakthrough discoveries in MPI’s labs, GENIE generators are being designed operate continuously, without fuel, extracting electricity by converting an energy source that exists everywhere in the universe. This process create no pollution. The cost of electricity is estimated to be significantly less than any competing form of power generation, today or in the foreseeable future.

GENIE generators with no moving parts can be made in many of the world’s electronics factories. Household units will produce power 24/7. Larger units will replace automobile engines. GENIE will eliminate any need for fuel to run a vehicle. It can also allow future cars to become income producing power plants when parked.

GENIE is a magnetic device. Nobel physicist Werner Heisenberg once stated: “We could utilize magnetism as an energy source”. Hans Coler demonstrated a 6 Kilowatt, solid-state, magnetic “space energy receiver” in Germany during 1937. It was destroyed by an Allied bomb during WWII. The invention was confirmed by British Intelligence after the War. However, at the time, there was no comprehension as to the source of the energy. Coler wrote: “These fundamental researches…have made the first real and large breach in the citadel of present scientific belief.”

Advanced GENIE prototypes are currently being constructed by MPI. Lee Felsenstein, EE, evaluated an early proof-of-concept prototype. He felt it to be analogous to the first examples of the transistor, which eventually led to a Nobel Prize and the creation of Silicon Valley (and similar high-tech complexes throughout the world).

A near-term MPI goal is a 1 kW self-sustaining generator perhaps 5″x5″x16″ in size. In 2008, a plug-in hybrid car, with a pair of these 1,000 watt GENIE prototypes, is expected to demonstrate that a connection to the grid is not necessary in order to recharge the battery. That will herald the beginning of an end to the need for fuel.

The urgent need is for an emergency changeover, in less than a decade, from burning fuel, to widespread use of new sources of energy that eliminate the need for fossil fuels. The Triple Play made possible by GENIE makes that a practical goal. We applaud all efforts to replace oil and reduce greenhouse gases. However, nothing short of revolutionary new technology can act fast enough to save millions of lives.

Scientists may express skepticism, since the energy source is not yet widely understood. Acceptance will come when one sits on a desk in front of them and produces electricity. MPI is developing Demonstration Devices and toys. Young people with open minds will probably teach their parents how they function. This Triple Play can and will accelerate, as rapidly as the required funding will allow. © 2007 Magnetic Power Inc. All rights reserved.

# Comments:

by illuminaughty on Saturday, October 20, 2007 :
If the world is collapsed under the weight of water rushing off melting glaciers in 2050, I suspect the last thing we’ll hear is that the GENIE device will be ready for production in 2051.

From my collection of MPI’s best predictions:

January 2006: We have several OU devices, but production of a demo unit requires more working capital. If enough money comes in quickly, I believe we can meet the goal of having a pre-manufacturing prototype of a self-powered motor or generator by the end of June.

June 2006: Demonstration Devices are designed to begin to enter the market later this year. These will make it difficult for scientists and skeptics to maintain that such technology is impossible.

December 2006: MPI has applied to Present our technology at the O’Reilly Energy Conference in San Francisco which will run from August 22nd thru the 24th, 2007.

October 2007: 1 kW GENIE generators are moving toward the market. And while some may find it hard to believe, they are likely to be in production by the end of next year.

– MDG nov07: With a patent accorded in 2006, we can expect at least a few years for complet development and commercialization.
When we are in the process of developing a new product, it’s amazing how every single thing takes time and money. Even in some cases it become so difficult that the initiator(s) surrender, and go to something else. Innovating and ‘saving’ the world is NOT AN EASY THING.
Thank you for your understanding, and patience. (I’m not involved in MPI business, but can witness through my experiences how it is difficult to bring something to marketplace, even if it’s something very useful and wanted … )