### Rowe, Paul: (page created at November 2007 update)
## A History of Dark Matter?, http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/02/a_history_of_dark_matter.html
Paul Rowe has been investigating an interesting phenomenon – the unexplained production of hydrogen in circumstances that should not ordinarily allow for the release of the gas.
In an earlier article, Hydrogen From Space – The Aether ‘Comes Alive’ http://blog.hasslberger.com/2006/06/hydrogen_from_space_the_aether.html , Rowe introduced the argument with a screenplay – The Fall and Rise of the House of Cards – where we find him in conversation with some of the great luminaries of physics. In a very vivid dream, he is trying – with limited success – to get them to admit that they already knew in their own lifetime what Rowe has happened upon by his own experiments.
Infinite Energy http://www.infinite-energy.com/ magazine wrote about the hydrogen riddle in a two-part article: An Unexpected Source of Clean Energy? http://blog.hasslberger.com/docs/RoweCleanEnergy.pdf and An Unexpected Source of Clean Energy? Part II http://blog.hasslberger.com/docs/RoweCleanEnergyII.pdf .
Now, Rowe has written another paper collecting relevant quotes from earlier works and examining the evidence from a different vantage point: Could the matrix of protons and electrons that apparently permeates space and may be responsible for the appearance – seemingly out of nowhere – of hydrogen gas in a series of experiments, could that matrix be what some mainstream scientists have termed dark matter? Here is the recent article:
# A History of Dark Matter?
In developing their wave equations, both Huygens and Maxwell assumed space was filled with touching material particles. Since their equations correctly predict important properties of light, their concepts of a material ether were accepted as fact, until early in the twentieth century.
Several experimenters, including Sir J.J. Thompson, reported the appearance of surprisingly large quantities of hydrogen gas during electrical discharge in vacuum. Clarence Skinner reported that during electrical discharge in low-pressure helium, hydrogen was produced at the cathode and the initial rate of hydrogen production obeyed Faradays laws of electrolysis. He obtained thousands of times more hydrogen from a silver cathode than it could have originally contained.
Recently scientists have produced Bose-Einstein Condensed rubidium, sodium and lithium and found that they transmit light at much lower speeds than vacuum. Could dark matter be Bose-Einstein condensed hydrogen and the medium for light transmission?
According to Linus Pauling, atomic hydrogen is paramagnetic. If Bose-Einstein condensed hydrogen is a matrix of protons and unpaired electrons, it would be paramagnetic and have dielectric properties. The presence of such a matrix permits simple explanations of the forces between separated permanent magnets.
# Seventeenth Century:
Christiaan Huygens book, Treatise on Light, was published in 1678. An English translation was published by Encylopaeda Britannica, in 19521. The translation includes the following:
Huygens referred to an experiment, in which Torricelli (a contemporary of Galileo) filled a glass U-tube with mercury to a sealed end and evacuated the tube through the other end. Light passed through the space that developed at the sealed end. Huygens concluded that the medium for light transfer was present in vacuum and that the medium easily passes through the glass and/or the mercury. He proposed that the medium was made up of extremely fine, touching material particles, which transfer light by a mechanism similar to that by which sound travels through air. He suggested the energy is transferred much like the transfer of energy from sphere to sphere in a series of suspended balls. All the energy on one ball is transferred to an adjacent ball. The velocity of transfer depends on the properties of the balls. The following quote is from the English translation:
And it must be known that, although the particles of the ether are not ranged thus in straight lines, as in our row of spheres, but confusedly, so that one of them touches several others. This does not hinder them from transmitting their movement and spreading it always forward. 2
He assumed that each activated ether particle is the start of a new wave and, on this basis, developed equations that predict observed diffraction patterns. For many years, scientists considered this strong evidence of a material ether.
# Nineteenth Century:
James Clerk Maxwells book, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism Volume 2 was first published in 1891.3 The following quotes are from that book:
In several parts of this treatise an attempt has been made to explain electromagnetic phenomena by means of mechanical action transmitted from one body to another by means of a medium occupying the space between them. The undulatory theory of light also assumes the existence of a medium. We have now to shew that the properties of the electromagnetic medium are identical with those of the luminiferous medium.
To fill all space with a new medium whenever any new phenomenon is to be explained is by no means philosophical, but if the study of two different branches of science has independently suggested the idea of a medium, and if the properties which must be attributed to the medium in order to account for electromagnetic phenomena are of the same kind as those which we attribute to the luminiferous medium in order to account for the phenomena of light, the evidence for the physical existence of the medium will be considerably strengthened 4
According to the theory of undulation, there is a material medium which fills the space between the two bodies and it is by the action of contiguous parts of this medium that the energy is passed on, from one portion to the next, til it reaches the illuminated body. 5
Let us determine the conditions of the propagation of an electromagnetic disturbance through a uniform medium, which we shall suppose to be at rest, that is, to have no motion except that which may be involved in electromagnetic disturbances. Let C be the specific conductivity of the medium, K its specific capacity and u its magnetic permeability.6
Both Huygens and Maxwell based their wave equations on the presence of touching material particles in vacuum. If, in Huygens mechanism, an activated ether particle often passed its energy to more than one adjacent particle, the frequency of the energy transmitted would be quickly reduced. Since this is not the case, the great majority of activated particles must pass all of their energy to one adjacent particle. Maxwells mechanism requires that the medium have magnetic and dielectric properties. Magnetic properties are generally attributed to the presence of unpaired electrons. Dielectric properties require the presence of negative and positive particles. This suggests that his medium might be a matrix of unpaired electrons and positive particles.
# Early Twentieth Century:
The following is the introduction to a 1905 article by Clarence Skinner of the University of Nebraska:
While making an experimental study of the cathode fall of various metals in helium it was observed that no matter how carefully the gas was purified the hydrogen tested spectroscopically, persistently appeared in the cathode glow. Simultaneous with this appearance there was also a continuous increase in the gas pressure with time of discharge. This change in gas pressure was remarkable because of its being much greater than that which had been observed under the same conditions with either nitrogen, oxygen or hydrogen.
Now the variation in cathode fall with current density and with gas pressure in helium was found to be so like that obtained with hydrogen that it appeared necessary to maintain the helium free of the latter in order to make sure that the hydrogen present was not the factor causing this similarity in the results. Futile endeavors to attain this condition led to the present investigation, which locates the source of the hydrogen in the cathode, shows that the quantity of hydrogen evolved by a fresh cathode obeys Faradays law for electrolytes, and that a fresh anode absorbs hydrogen by the same law. 7
Skinner employed various metals as cathode and found that most tarnished during discharge in helium and each produced hydrogen. Metals tarnish in the presence of atomic hydrogen, but not in helium. The following quote is from his article:
Altogether about two cubic centimeters of gas have been given off by this silver disk, which is 15 mm in diameter and about 1 mm thick. It shows no sign of having its supply of hydrogen reduced in the least. 8
Many respected experimenters have reported the surprising appearance of hydrogen gas in their experiments. The following quote is from a 1914 article by Sir J.J. Thomson:
I would like to direct attention to the analogy between the effect just described and an everyday experience with discharge tubes. I mean the difficulty of getting these tubes free from hydrogen when the test is made by a sensitive method like that of positive rays. Though you may heat the glass tube to the melting point, may dry the gases by liquid air or cooled charcoal and free gases you let into the tube as carefully as you will from hydrogen, you will get hydrogen lines by the positive ray method, even when the bulb has been running several hours a day for nearly a year. 9
Since the gases tested by Thomson were subjected to electrical discharge prior to test, he may have produced hydrogen by the same mechanism as Skinner. If the medium proposed by Maxwell is a matrix of protons and unpaired electrons, atomic hydrogen might be produced from the medium by electrolysis. If so, the hydrogen would be produced at a fresh cathode at the rate predicted by Faradays laws. Atomic hydrogen is extremely reactive and would be expected to tarnish metal cathodes and form diatomic hydrogen gas, as noted by Skinner.
In a 1914 article10, George Winchester of Washington and Jefferson College gave results of electrical discharge experiments using cp aluminum electrodes approximately one millimeter apart and pressures as low as one millionth of a millimeter. He obtained hydrogen and traces of helium and neon early in the experiments. He proposed that helium and neon had been occluded in the electrodes.
The case of hydrogen is different; I have sparked tubes until the electrodes were entirely wasted away and this gas can be obtained as long as any metal remains. 11
A 1928 article12 by Stearcie and Johnson of McGill University reports on an exhaustive study of the solubility of hydrogen gas in silver. They reported that, at 25° C, silver absorbed 0.007 volumes of hydrogen per volume of silver. As pointed out above, Skinners silver cathode, which had volume of about 0.08 cc produced 2 cc of hydrogen gas or 25 times its volume of hydrogen and,
It shows no sign of having its supply of hydrogen reduced in the least. 8
The cathode could have contained only 0.08 X 0.007 = 0.00056 cc of hydrogen. The hydrogen Skinner produced could not have been initially present in his silver cathode.
# Mid Twentieth Century:
The following quotes are from Linus Paulings, Nature of the Chemical Bond 13:
The most stable orbit in every atom is the 1s orbit of the K shell. In the normal hydrogen atom this is occupied by one electron, the spin magnetic moment of which makes monatomic hydrogen gas paramagnetic. In the normal helium atom the 1s orbit is occupied by two electrons, which are required by the exclusion principle to have opposed spins; in sequence of this helium is diamagnetic, the spin magnetic moment of the two electrons neutralizing one another. 14
It is customary to refer to electrons with opposed spins as paired, whether they occupy the same orbit in one atom or are involved in the formation of a bond. 15
If space is filled with a matrix of protons and electrons, the structure may be similar to that of molten salt. Just as no chloride ion touches another chloride ion; no electron touches another electron and the electrons are not paired. Such a matrix would be paramagnetic and respond appropriately to an approaching magnet. The presence of such a matrix permits a simple explanation for the forces between separated permanent magnets.
# Later in the Twentieth Century:
The January 1982 issue of Scientific American includes an article by Silvera and Walraven of Harvard University. It discusses Bose-Einstein condensation. The following quotes are from that article: 16
The statistical theory that describes atoms was first studied by the Indian physicist S. N. Bose and is called Bose statistics. The phenomenon predicted by Einstein is a mathematical consequence of Bose statistics, but it was so contrary to the intuition of physicists in the 1920s that it was regarded as a mathematical oddity that would never be found in a real system. It is now thought, however, that the phenomenon is observable in the laboratory. It is called Bose-Einstein condensation. 17
In a Bose-Einstein-condensed gas, however, a large fraction of the atoms would occupy the ground state at an experimentally accessible temperature, and nearly 100 percent of the atoms would become condensate at a temperature above absolute zero. 18
The most sought after quantum phenomenon is a sudden condensation of a large proportion of the atoms in the gas into a state of minimum energy. The condensation is expected to take place at a low temperature that depends only on the temperature of the gas. For example, at a density of 1024 atoms per cubic centimeter the critical temperature is .016 degrees K, whereas at the density of interstellar hydrogen the critical temperature is 10-18 degree K. The critical temperature for the condensate is proportional to the density raised to the 2/3 power. 19
It is the coherent motion of the condensate atoms of a Bose-Einstein-condensed gas that is expected to give rise to extraordinary macroscopic properties at a temperature well above absolute zero. 20
It is highly possible but not definitely established by experiment that superfluid helium 4 is Bose-Einstein condensed. 21
Liquid helium 4 at or below 2.18 degrees is therefore called a superfluid. If it is set flowing in a tube closed on itself, the liquid continues to flow without friction, never coming to a stop as a normal fluid would. It flows into the smallest passages of its containing vessel and has the remarkable ability to flow through a densely packed powder as if the barrier were not present. A vessel with microscopic holes that would be impenetrable to a normal fluid can be a leaky sieve to a superfluid. Such a vessel is said to have a superleak. 22
If the medium assumed by Huygens and Maxwell is actually Bose-Einstein condensed hydrogen, in which each electron is surrounded by protons and each proton is surrounded by electrons (similar to sodium and chloride ions in molted salt) and all the particles are touching, the condensate would be stable to extremely high temperatures. The space between atomic nuclei of materials would be extremely wide gaps to the condensate, which might be expected to flow through materials, with no resistance. The following quote is from a 1969 textbook by Weidner and Sells.
We shall see that, apart from the tremendous difference in their relative sizes, 10-10 m for atoms but less than 10-14 m for nuclei, nuclear structure is different from atomic structure in several significant respects. 23
Every nucleus contains, at least one proton. This suggests that protons, like electrons, are extremely small compared to the spaces between the nuclei of materials. Could the spaces between nuclei be filled with the proposed medium?
As pointed out earlier, the critical temperature for Bose-Einstein condensation is proportional to the density raised to the 2/3 power. Using the known weights of protons and electrons and assuming radii of 10-15 meters, for each, one may calculate that a matrix of touching protons and electrons would be stable to extremely high temperatures.
# Early Twenty First Century:
An article in the December 2000 issue of Scientific American describes the work of Daniel Kleppner and Thomas Greytak of MIT. 24
When his former students were making their spectacular condensates of rubidium, sodium and lithium (alkali atoms), Kleppner was battling his career-long atom of choice; hydrogen. He has been studying hydrogen since he was a graduate student and postdoc at Harvard University in the late 1950s.
Their experiments toward producing Bose-Einstein condensed hydrogen appeared to be unsuccessful until they employed spin-polarized hydrogen. Perhaps, they had produced Bose-Einstein condensed hydrogen earlier, but couldnt detect it. It is difficult to detect water you have produced in a lake, in summer. Ice is much easier to detect.
Daniel Kleppner began pursuing Bose-Einstein condensation in hydrogen back in 1976, racing against a Dutch group: It took a little longer than any of us expected.
The July 2001 issue of Scientific American includes an article by Lene Vestegaard Hau titled, Frozen Light.25 The article describes experiments her group performed at the Rowland Institute. They passed laser beams into Bose-Einstein condensed sodium and found that it transferred light at a much lower speed than vacuum. They were able to stop light transmission and then restart it, at will, using appropriate laser beams.
If Bose-Einstein condensed sodium transfers light, one might expect Bose-Einstein condensed hydrogen to transfer light at a much faster rate.
If the knowable is filled with touching materials the concepts of action at a distance should be reconsidered.
1. Huygens C. Treatise on Light, Great Books of the Western World 34, Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., 13th printing pp. 556-560 (1988)
2. ibid p. 560
3. Maxwell, J.C., A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. 2, unabridged. 3rd ed., republished Dover Publications, New York, (1984). First published (1891)
4. ibid p. 431
5. ibid p. 432
6. ibid p. 433
7. Skinner, C.A. The Evolution of Hydrogen from the Cathode and its Adsorption by the Anode in Gases., Phys. Rev. 21, 1-15 (1914)
8. ibid p. 6
9. Thomson, J.J., Nature, 90, pp. 645-647, (1914)
10. Winchester, G., On the continued Appearance of Gases in Vacuum Tubes, Phys. Rev. 3, pp. 287-94, (1914)
11. ibid. p. 290
12. Stearcie, E and Johnson, F., The Solubility of Hydrogen in Silver, Proc. Roy. Soc., London, A, 101, pp. 290-299, (1928)
13. Pauling, L., Nature of the Chemical Bond, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1945
14. ibid pp. 21-22
15. ibid p. 22
16. Silvera, I. And Walraven, J., The Stabilization of Atomic Hydrogen, Scientific American, pp. 66- 74, Jan. 1982
17. ibid pp. 66-67
18. ibid. p. 67
19. ibid p. 66
20. ibid p. 67
21. ibid p. 68
23. Weidner, R. and Sells, R. Elementary Modern Physics, 2nd ed. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, p. 372, 1969
24. Collins, P., Hydrogen Man, the Godfather of BEC, Scientific American, Dec. 2000, p. 98
25. Hau, L.V., Frozen Light, Scientific American, pp. 66-73, July, 2001
Paul E. Rowe: email@example.com ; 2/18/07
– February 22, 2007 04:55 PM| Posted by: David Yurth http://novainstituteoftechnology.com/wst_page2.html
Comment (by email) from David Yurth:Hi Sepp.
The phenomenon Dr. Rowe is referring to has nothing at all to do with dark matter. There is no such thing, in first place. And in the second place, the spontaneous production of hydrogen is absolutely consistent with everything we know about self-organizing criticality and primary scalar interactions. It is predicted by the Y-Bias model http://tinyurl.com/2uxnpo – its discovery serves to further validate the premise.
– February 22, 2007 05:16 PM | Posted by: Michael
Michael comments (by email): Interesting reading. At the same time, using Bearden’s logic, in a “vacuum” (there is no such thing, however – only partial vacua – some atoms are always present) if there is a dipole as indicated, each pole will have an accumulation of virtual particles surrounding it – i.e. even virtual protons and electrons – the stuff of which hydrogen is made. As such it is possible that some of them gain enough energy from the electrodes to emerge as real and stay that way. One would have to check after leaving the chamber for an extended time to see if they are still there.
The possibility also exists that “dark matter” is simply ubiquitous gases extremely diffuse in the partial vacuum of space. Also remember that hydrogen atoms can penetrate almost anything because of their minute size, thus broaching the possibility that the detected hydrogen actually simply leaked into the vacuum chamber from outside. As I recall, no container can hold hydrogen under pressure indefinitely, as it will eventually leak out.
– February 22, 2007 05:18 PM | Posted by: Sepp
My reply to Michael:both Paul Rowe and earlier experimenters have thought that the hydrogen might be simply contamination that “seeped” into the experiment and they took all possible precautions to eliminate that possibility. Still, the phenomenon persisted.
– February 22, 2007 10:16 PM | Posted by: John Bockris
John Bockris says (by email): MY MY! Have we not been talking about H2 in space for a long time. I remember that Walther Nerns wrote about clouds of H2 in his 1928 book about the red shift.
– February 22, 2007 10:20 PM | Posted by: Michael
Michael again (by email):Dear Sepp,
There is a “hitch” in such an experiment because the higher the vacuum in the chamber, the greater the possibility that H will leak in, and the lower the vacuum, the greater the possibility that there already is H in the chamber. As I said, H is very difficult to keep contained under pressure, and with a vacuum chamber, it’s difficult to keep out. I’m not saying it’s impossible. At the same time, a la Bearden, the virtual particle accumulation around a charged electrode, which has field of its own, creating its own real/virtual dipole, could possibly bring some virtuals up into the real energy level, or attract H atoms already resident, or attract protons at one electrode and electrons at the other which form loosely bound H atoms as well.
– February 23, 2007 03:24 AM | Posted by: jim cranwell
it’s not a matrix of protons and electrons that apparently permeates space… it’s this… http://gravityboy.gootar.com/docs/gravity.html
hydrogen is also easily created from flux particles. It’s just a change in shape.
– February 23, 2007 06:56 AM | Posted by: Carl Littmann
Very good, thought provoking and informative article by Rowe… I’m not a great expert but my miscellaneous comments are as follows: When viscous liq He-I is further cooled, it actually EXPANDS as it transitions into zero-viscosity He-II (i.e., despite the term, ‘condensate’). When further cooled and highly compressed into ‘all-solid’ He, each jurisdictional volume for each He atom is about three times greater than helium’s ‘Van der Waals’ volume (per each He atom). In an article I’m writing for a group (NPA), I ‘philosophize’ that “somewhat like the hard-to-detect ‘aether drag’ and ‘aether wind’; zero-viscosity Helium’s drag or viscosity is hard to detect also — but that doesn’t prove the cold helium does NOT exist! Rowe’s quote on Huygen’s Treatise regarding ultra small “particles touching particles in space” is especially interesting to me because of an article I wrote at
http://www.causeeffect.org/articles/particle.html (in case anyone is interested in it, and if it desplays readably.)